For task owners / acceptance check review
Get your AI agent acceptance checks reviewed
You have a task and a checklist. Could an empty result still pass?
The $1 Wringer audit gives your existing acceptance criteria an AI critique before the run. Ask for checks with a defined input, an observable result, and a failure case, so the eventual handoff has something concrete to review.
Review my acceptance checks for $1Pay per audit. The review is simulated with no real tools. You verify the actual deliverable later.
01 / WORKED EXAMPLE
Review a data-cleaning handoff before it runs
Before: “Clean the customer CSV. Remove duplicates and make it ready to import.” A duplicate check alone says nothing about lost records, which row to keep, or who approves the import.
Repaired work order: On a local copy, deduplicate by exact customer_id. Keep the first source row for each ID, preserve its other fields, and write a separate output file plus a removal log. Do not overwrite the input or import anything. Stop for human review if an ID is blank. Stop after five attempts and report unresolved checks.
| Check | Failure case | Pass condition |
|---|---|---|
| Completeness | An empty file has no duplicates but loses every customer. | The four-row fixture A1, A1, B2, C3 produces exactly three rows with the ID set A1, B2, C3. |
| Retention | The later A1 row replaces the first, or a retained field changes. | Compare each retained row with the first matching source row. The removal log identifies only the second A1 row. |
| Human gate | A blank ID is silently dropped, or an unreviewed file is imported. | A separate blank-ID fixture stops the job for review. The task owner confirms the output and log before any later import. |
The audit can question the checks and propose clearer wording. It does not open the CSV, run these comparisons, or approve an import. Those are acceptance steps for the person executing and reviewing the actual work.
02 / WHAT TO BUY
A critique of the plan for accepting the work
- Bring the current checks. Draft for free. Describe your inputs, expected output, known bad cases, and what must stay unchanged.
- Audit for $1. Read the grade, predicted exit, simulated notes, and suggested repairs. Apply a returned repair only after reviewing it.
- Decide how to verify. Name the evidence and the human reviewer you will need when the work is done. Execution is a separate choice.
If you only need to learn the format, start with the free acceptance-criteria guide. Buy an audit when you want a critique of your particular work order. A subject expert still needs to supply any missing business rules.
For repository tasks, see the coding work order review. The audit walkthrough shows what the $1 review returns.
Before you pay
Can The Wringer review acceptance criteria I already wrote?
Yes. Put your goal, existing acceptance criteria, boundaries, and attempt limit into the work order. The $1 audit critiques that brief and can suggest more checkable criteria. Drafting and editing are free.
Will the audit check my spreadsheet or finished deliverable?
No. The audit uses no real tools. It reviews the work order and produces simulated dry-run notes. It does not inspect your files, validate row counts, or decide whether a completed deliverable passes.
Can every acceptance check be automated?
No. Use automatic checks for exact counts, required fields, and known fixtures. Assign a human check when someone must decide whether an output is suitable for its intended use. State who reviews it and what they must confirm.
Does a good audit grade guarantee acceptance?
No. A grade is an AI opinion about the brief. You still need real evidence from the eventual run and a reviewer for any human checks. Execution is separate, and you can use the reviewed order outside The Wringer.